|
Yetis vs. Unicorns?
|
01-12-2022, 10:34 AM
“ Octopussies are sentient. Squid are just detached anenomies.”
There are some Humboldt Squid out there that will fight you for that.
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
10-10-2022, 01:38 PM
![[Image: 1744_21-Betty-Fairground-large-with-capt...quality=85]](https://www.beano.com/wp-content/uploads/legacy/1744_21-Betty-Fairground-large-with-captipons-4.gif?w=485&strip=all&quality=85) Yeah, I don't know what this means either but it had to be posted here...
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
10-10-2022, 04:09 PM
But…unicorns are *assholes*!
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
08-31-2025, 02:41 PM
Sigh. I’m not liking this representation.
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
08-31-2025, 03:53 PM
At least the yeti got a rice krispy treat
That’s more than can be said for any unicorn
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
08-31-2025, 04:29 PM
(08-31-2025, 03:53 PM)Drunk Monk Wrote: At least the yeti got a rice krispy treat Truth. Unicorns don't deserve treats. They're stabby-faced murder-horses and quite rude.
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.giphy.com%2Fmedi...f=1&nofb=1]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FGQNgQ6gHtKDyE%2F200.gif&f=1&nofb=1)