01-11-2023, 01:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2023, 01:59 AM by Drunk Monk.)
I didn’t know anything about this film but it looked fun. Wow. What a gem.
It had me at ‘hello’ with the opening scene - a sprawling landscape scene of thr battle of Sekigahara. In 65, there were no effects. That’s a huge mob scene. HUGE.
Then it moves to a dozen plus years later and war is brewing. A samurai scout gets entangled in a web of ninjas and painfully complicated political intrigue. I gave up trying to follow that until the end when it all came together. I think that was an intentional device of the tale because the samurai is constantly discovering who the enemy might be and it reflects his own confusion.
This has everything the chanbara of the 70s had: sanguineous, lopped off body bits, brutal torture and murder, and good swordfights. The choreo is frenzied at first but it’s working to that finale duel and it’s on this epic bridge, that again, isn’t a special effect. It’s not a set either. It’s this crazy folk bridge and it’s huge. HUGE. There’s not many set pieces here. It’s real temples and structures - old school architecture still appropriate to the period.
Most of all, it’s of that age when directors really understood B&W. The cinematographic compositions are like stark photos that move. It’s just beautiful to behold these arrangements of light and shadow.’many times I was just awestruck on how the scene was framed.
Setting some of thr fights in these panoramic settings really works, and the fights are fun. There’s a lot of shuriken to the head & one against dozens, but there are also some excellent 1on1 duels and some borderline one-ers. There’s this wonderful scene where the samurai sees his buddy fighting off several attacks in a distant field and he charges in but it’s done in real space so we see the fight from the hill, the charge down the hill and then the fight. Delightful continuity.
I should just trust in criterion and watch every martial arts film they have. They select some choice stuff - top shelf martial arts flicks.
It had me at ‘hello’ with the opening scene - a sprawling landscape scene of thr battle of Sekigahara. In 65, there were no effects. That’s a huge mob scene. HUGE.
Then it moves to a dozen plus years later and war is brewing. A samurai scout gets entangled in a web of ninjas and painfully complicated political intrigue. I gave up trying to follow that until the end when it all came together. I think that was an intentional device of the tale because the samurai is constantly discovering who the enemy might be and it reflects his own confusion.
This has everything the chanbara of the 70s had: sanguineous, lopped off body bits, brutal torture and murder, and good swordfights. The choreo is frenzied at first but it’s working to that finale duel and it’s on this epic bridge, that again, isn’t a special effect. It’s not a set either. It’s this crazy folk bridge and it’s huge. HUGE. There’s not many set pieces here. It’s real temples and structures - old school architecture still appropriate to the period.
Most of all, it’s of that age when directors really understood B&W. The cinematographic compositions are like stark photos that move. It’s just beautiful to behold these arrangements of light and shadow.’many times I was just awestruck on how the scene was framed.
Setting some of thr fights in these panoramic settings really works, and the fights are fun. There’s a lot of shuriken to the head & one against dozens, but there are also some excellent 1on1 duels and some borderline one-ers. There’s this wonderful scene where the samurai sees his buddy fighting off several attacks in a distant field and he charges in but it’s done in real space so we see the fight from the hill, the charge down the hill and then the fight. Delightful continuity.
I should just trust in criterion and watch every martial arts film they have. They select some choice stuff - top shelf martial arts flicks.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse

