Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Whiskys (non-Irish or Scot) & Bourbons
#91
Quote:[Image: cfa1ccbe4efa5cdbeb16634dc67b6d0e.jpg?v=1753877233]
[Image: d3057fe78f89958bc92baa5bbab96a47.jpg?v=1753877233]
[Image: 6e0fd103cbbdb7ddc60d09aaf97b5d57.jpg?v=1753877233]
[Image: 9c8c961d1dd3fefebd574ddea74e29f2.jpg?v=1753877233]

The Eternal Tour Anniversary Whiskey Decanter – For the Music That Never Ends


?In demand. 98 people bought this in the last 24 hours.

$39.99
$79.98
You Save: $ 39.99 (50%)

Style Option*:  
Crown Royal
Jack Daniel's
Maker's Mark
Blanton's
 5 visitors currently looking at this product
 ?  100% Refund.
 ✨  New item released
ADD TO CART
Celebrate a legacy of endless rhythm and free-spirited sound with this commemorative whiskey decanter! ???

This whiskey bottle hums with the spirit of improvisation and freedom, celebrating decades of music that moved generations. A must-have for fans and collectors alike, it’s both a functional decanter and a tribute to the band whose music—and magic—never stops.

? Keep the vibe alive—add this bottle to your collection before the final note fades! ??

✈️
DELIVERY
Delivery Time = Processing Time (1-3 business days) + Shipping Time
Shipping Method
Shipping Time
Standard Shipping
To US: 8-11 Days
Expedited Shipping
To US: 6-9 Days 
Urgent Shipping
To US: 4-6 Days
To US,UK,AU,CA and other countries
♻️
99 DAYS RETURN
Should you not be totally satisfied with your items we offer 99 day returns and exchanges service to ensure you are left as happy as possible.
Please see here for the full list of terms and conditions for our refund and exchange policy.

Well that's tempting...
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#92
You haven't bought it yet?

A bit misleading IMO about the 60th anniversary since the band hasn't existed for a number of years.
the hands that guide me are invisible
Reply
#93
30 years with Jerry
30 years without him

I’ve been at odds with the title Dead & Co 60 too because D&C is only a decade old (they formed after the Dead’s Fare the Well tour). Now it’s only Bobby & Mickey, Billy retired to Hawaii. But I’m ok with the spirit of it all living on. D&C60 was a fantastic gathering, one like I dare say we shall ever see again. Still grateful.

No i haven’t bought it. I really don’t need anymore GD stuff.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#94
Atari Joystick Decanter Set
[Image: ThumbsUp_-ATAORGDECSET-Image1-291024-Dal...1730379921]
the hands that guide me are invisible
Reply
#95
Slightly OT

Quote:
[Image: XenomorphDecanter_1080x.webp?v=1759328003]
[/url]


[url=https://www.lilyandeden.co/]Home /
XenoPour™ – Alien Decanter
Regular price$70.00 Sale price$39.00 Save 44%

I have no room for this in my house.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#96
Find room. It's only $40 bucks.
As a matter of fact, my anger does keep me warm

Reply
#97
Time to get out the ol' copper kettle!

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/apr...titutional

Quote:US appeals court declares 158-year-old home distilling ban unconstitutional

Judge said ban, which originated in Reconstruction era to thwart liquor tax evasion, actually reduced tax revenue
[img=465x372.2054491899853]https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/a859b633790bc8805cfd1c9fa2c9cf44ebdacb20/0_0_4074_3261/master/4074.jpg?width=465&dpr=1&s=none&crop=none[/img]
A US appeals court on Friday declared a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling to be unconstitutional, calling it an unnecessary and improper means for Congress to exercise its power to tax.
The fifth US circuit court of appeals in New Orleans ruled in favor of the non-profit Hobby Distillers Association and four of its 1,300 members.

They argued that people should be free to distill spirits at home, whether as a hobby or for personal consumption including, in one instance, to create an apple-pie-vodka recipe.

The ban was part of a law passed during the US’s post-civil war Reconstruction era in July 1868, in part to thwart liquor tax evasion, and subjected violators to up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Writing for a three-judge panel, the circuit judge Edith Hollan Jones said the ban actually reduced tax revenue by preventing distilling in the first place, unlike laws that regulated the manufacture and labeling of distilled spirits on which the government could collect taxes.

She also said that under the government’s logic, Congress could criminalize virtually any in-home activity that might escape notice from tax collectors, including remote work and home-based businesses.

“Without any limiting principle, the government’s theory would violate this court’s obligation to read the constitution carefully to avoid creating a general federal authority akin to the police power,” Jones wrote.
The US justice department had no immediate comment. Another defendant, the treasury department’s alcohol and tobacco tax and trade bureau, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Devin Watkins, a lawyer representing the Hobby Distillers Association, called the ruling an important decision about the limits of federal power.

Andrew Grossman, who argued the non-profit’s appeal, called the decision “an important victory for individual liberty” that allows the plaintiffs to “pursue their passion to distill fine beverages in their homes”.
“I look forward to sampling their output,” he said.

The decision upheld a July 2024 ruling by the US district judge Mark Pittman in Fort Worth, Texas. He put his ruling on hold so the government could appeal.

--tg
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)