01-08-2018, 03:25 PM
I picked this up at the library sale because I had read Neil Gaiman's introduction to it in The View from the Cheap Seats. He loved it; I did not. The story itself is not bad, but stretched out to far longer than need be. If it had been a short story I think it would have been better. And the language is convoluted; I found I often had to re-read a sentence to figure out what it meant. And sometimes I just fell asleep. It's sort of high-flown Victorian folklore style crossed with Paradise Lost. (Maybe it would have worked better as an epic poem.) Lovecraft loved his work, FYI, which probably helps explain his syntax too.
On the other hand, it did have some great imagery, so I won't call it a waste of time. But know what you're getting into if you try it. Ultimately I'd call it more historically interesting than a good read. A shorter and I think better work of his, "The Fortress Unvanquished Save for Sacnoth" can be found in the Oxford Book of Fantasy. If you just want a taste of Dunsany that will not require as much of a time investment.
On the other hand, it did have some great imagery, so I won't call it a waste of time. But know what you're getting into if you try it. Ultimately I'd call it more historically interesting than a good read. A shorter and I think better work of his, "The Fortress Unvanquished Save for Sacnoth" can be found in the Oxford Book of Fantasy. If you just want a taste of Dunsany that will not require as much of a time investment.
the hands that guide me are invisible