09-21-2012, 09:11 AM
You have to feel bad about the reception of this film. It's not bad. It just has a lot of things working against it.
First off, is the premise. When the original books were written, Mars was a big mystery. But it was firmly believed that there were canals on Mars, evidence of civilization. A hundred years later we have explorers on Mars and we know that is patently not true. It would almost have been better if the series had been set on another far flung planet. I kept thinking well this is all well and good to have these civilizations but I know they can't exist. And Mars has such a bad response in movie titles from audiences they removed it from the title.
It is amazing what $250 million can buy you. You can have armies of four armed aliens running around in every scene. You can have huge detailed cites with flying space ships. One of the cities even walks the dirt of Mars. It all looked really beautiful. But again I kept thinking wow those are really beautifully rendered CGI cities. They never seemed part of the environment. And because of the 3-D some of the John Carter actor shots looked bad. He almost looked like he was up against a rear screen projection.
The story was fine. I thought the first twenty minutes or so was really good. They had some good character and action stuff in a fort in the southwest, I really liked. When he gets to Mars, he's just a prop for the set pieces. He does have some funny interaction with a giant dog/hippo thing that becomes his pet. The film could definitely use some more humor. Everybody took themselves a bit too seriously.
All and all, it was fine. It didn't overwhelm me. But it wasn't as terrible as the press made it out to be.
First off, is the premise. When the original books were written, Mars was a big mystery. But it was firmly believed that there were canals on Mars, evidence of civilization. A hundred years later we have explorers on Mars and we know that is patently not true. It would almost have been better if the series had been set on another far flung planet. I kept thinking well this is all well and good to have these civilizations but I know they can't exist. And Mars has such a bad response in movie titles from audiences they removed it from the title.
It is amazing what $250 million can buy you. You can have armies of four armed aliens running around in every scene. You can have huge detailed cites with flying space ships. One of the cities even walks the dirt of Mars. It all looked really beautiful. But again I kept thinking wow those are really beautifully rendered CGI cities. They never seemed part of the environment. And because of the 3-D some of the John Carter actor shots looked bad. He almost looked like he was up against a rear screen projection.
The story was fine. I thought the first twenty minutes or so was really good. They had some good character and action stuff in a fort in the southwest, I really liked. When he gets to Mars, he's just a prop for the set pieces. He does have some funny interaction with a giant dog/hippo thing that becomes his pet. The film could definitely use some more humor. Everybody took themselves a bit too seriously.
All and all, it was fine. It didn't overwhelm me. But it wasn't as terrible as the press made it out to be.
So much for the flickr badge idea. Dammit