Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The subject is the subject
#1
Why do forum replies allow you to post a new subject?

You are replying to a subject, ergo your subject would be identical.

Granted, you could modify the subject with a 'Re:' qualifier, but given the presentation of a forum discussion the original subject is always present.

If you must reply please don't subject me to additional subject subjects.
[Image: magpie13.gif]
Reply
#2
So you object to being subjected to additional subjects? But what if the object is to subject? Could you subjectively object, but not objectively object to extra subjects, subject, of course, to the most abject use of tortured grammar?

I'll take my answer on the air.
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
Reply
#3
I wish I wasn't subjected to that...

--tg
Reply
#4
At least I didn't objectify you.
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)