Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Musashi lives!
#1
Of course Musashi would have used a sword (probably wooden)

From: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070831/od_uk_nm/oukoe_uk_china_ninja">http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070831/od_ ... hina_ninja</a><!-- m -->


China kung fu monks seek apology for ninja affront


Fri Aug 31, 1:34 AM ET

BEIJING (Reuters) - China's Shaolin Temple, the cradle of Chinese kung fu, is demanding an apology from an Internet user who said its monks had once been beaten in unarmed combat by a Japanese ninja, Chinese media reported on Friday.
ADVERTISEMENT

Shaolin Temple, in the northern province of Henan, became famous in the West as the training ground for Kwai Chang "Grasshopper" Caine in the 1970s "Kung Fu" TV series.

Ninjas -- professional assassins trained in martial arts -- date back to mediaeval Japan.

"The so-called defeat is purely fabricated, and we demand the Internet user to apologise to the whole nation for the wrongs he or she did," the Beijing News said, citing a notice announced by a lawyer for the Shaolin monks.

Relations between Chinese and Japanese are sensitive at the best of times, with emotions still running high over Japan's invasion and occupation of parts of China in the first half of the 20th Century.

The Internet user, calling themselves "Five Minutes Every Day", said on an online forum last week that a Japanese ninja came to Shaolin, asked for a fight and many monks failed to beat him, the newspaper said.

"The facts that the monks could not defeat a Japanese ninja showed that they were named as kung fu masters in vain," the Internet user was quoted as saying in the post.

The Shaolin temple "strongly condemned the horrible deeds" of the user, the newspaper said.

"It is not only extremely irresponsible behaviour with respect to the Shaolin temple and its monks, but also to the whole martial art and Chinese nation," it quoted the monks as saying
[Image: magpie13.gif]
Reply
#2
Sparked by some knucklehead on an internet message board! How cool is that? Wow! I love our current planet.
Reply
#3
You insult the interweb! I demand that you retract your reckless and insulting statement! How dare you impugn the reputation of the World Wide Web?!

Retract now, or face...uh..um...or face my emphatically typed scorn!

Retract!

-Y
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
Reply
#4
And Bleah! while I'm at it.

Can't catch me! Can't catch....

oh.

Wait...



You know where I live, don't you?


Drat.



Ah, screw it.


Nyah, nyah, nyah!!!!
Reply
#5
Chinese newspapers often use web forums as their sources. I've seen it happen many times already (might even be in one or two of the articles I posted in the 'DM quotes' thread). Of course, it's not reliable by any means, but most Chinese newspapers are quite tabloid in nature, especially the ones in Taiwan, Hong Kong and overseas. That being said, it's funny that Reuters decided to pick this one up.

I've actually met Shaolin's lawyer - attorney Huang (I kid you not - that's what he prefers to be called). It might not be the same guy now, but he was in a tough seat, trying to control Shaolin's name internationally. What is telling about this statement is that it does not designate an accuser beyond 'the monks'. The 'monks' would never make such a collective statement legally. If it were official, it would have Abbot Yongxin's name on it. As it stands, it could have originated from any of the 40,000 practitioners in Shaolin.

I saw this come up on the KFM forum. I'd be digging into it more, but I'm on vacation now. That's the official DOOMShaolin comment on this. HK, please carry on with your taunting of the PPFY.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#6
I believe it was my volley on the "neener, neener, nee-ner!".

Retract your provocative statement regarding the veracity of the interweb, you running-dog capitalist stooge!
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
Reply
#7
My tethered rage spits fire upon your outrageous crimes! Nothing will make me contain my seething opulence against the perfidies spouted via digital maunderings of unrestrained hand nubbins.

Fie! Avaunt! Salute! Gorbachev!
Reply
#8
I admit defeat. Your reasoning is superior and unassailable. Much respect.
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
Reply
#9
Lucky for me. I just about passed out on that last one.
Reply
#10
Attorney Huang is involved. This is official.

Quote:Shaolin monks deny online tale of ninja that bested them, demand apology
Published: Friday, August 31, 2007 | 1:27 PM ET
Canadian Press

BEIJING (AP) - China's Shaolin Temple has demanded a public apology from an Internet user who claimed a Japanese ninja beat its kung fu-practising monks in a showdown, a lawyer said Friday.

An open letter from the temple posted on the Internet on Thursday denied the fight ever took place and called on the person who posted the claim under the name "Five minutes every day" to apologize to the temple's martial arts masters.

Monks from the temple, nestled in the Songshan Mountains of central China's Henan province, said they will consider legal action if he or she doesn't make a public apology.

Lawyer Huang Kun of Henan's Huizhi Law Firm confirmed in a telephone interview Friday that he had posted the letter on behalf of the temple.

The spat comes amid lingering tensions between China and Japan over wartime atrocities. Chinese remain highly sensitive to anything that smacks of Japanese militarism, particularly because many believe Tokyo has yet to show adequate remorse for its Second World War-era actions in China.

The posting last week on the "Iron Blood Bulletin Board Community" described a ninja who challenged the monks of the Shaolin Temple to a fight in August after practising boxing at a Japanese mountain retreat for five years. The Internet user claimed the monks accepted the challenge and the ninja won, proving the monks are trained to perform rather than fight.

The Shaolin Temple's letter said the posting was "evil" and "a pure fabrication." It said the account of the ninja's victory had been widely commented on and distributed, especially in Japan.

"This extremely irresponsible behaviour not only impacts the Shaolin Temple and its monks, but also the whole martial arts community and the Chinese people," it said.
http://www.cbc.ca/cp/Oddities/070831/K08...kip300x250
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#11
Irresponsible! Impact!

Feel the wrath of our mighty legal-fu!

Seems the bretheren need to chill, no? Maybe they just had a bad scorpion or something. Went down the wrong way. I'd be mad too.
Reply
#12
...gets my vote for the king of trolls.
[Image: nofeed.gif]
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)