03-28-2006, 01:41 PM
Crash reminded me a lot of Short Cuts - a film that I didn't think much of when I first saw it, but it really stuck with me. I have fond memories of it now. We'll see if Crash sticks with me as long. Both are LA stories, which I could care less about (except DOOM south stories, of course). Both use the device of multiple overlapping short stories, characters that are both good and evil, with no ultimate conclusion or coming together of all the elements. Crash had more race issues, so there was sort of a statement at the end - racism is bad.
Still, I was very entertained by Crash. It had some really good stuff in it and was a very well-crafted film. Like Short Cuts, I probably wouldn't sit through it again (but there aren't many movies I'd see again nowadays, mostly because I don't have the time anymore). It won the Oscar but I didn't see enough of the other movies to say whether it deserved it or not. Part of me thinks that the multiple-overlapping-story-without-conclusions is a really lazy way to write, but another part of me thinks that if I ever write fiction, I'd totally cop that device. I'd recommend the film, but I wouldn't recommend going way out of your way for it.
Still, I was very entertained by Crash. It had some really good stuff in it and was a very well-crafted film. Like Short Cuts, I probably wouldn't sit through it again (but there aren't many movies I'd see again nowadays, mostly because I don't have the time anymore). It won the Oscar but I didn't see enough of the other movies to say whether it deserved it or not. Part of me thinks that the multiple-overlapping-story-without-conclusions is a really lazy way to write, but another part of me thinks that if I ever write fiction, I'd totally cop that device. I'd recommend the film, but I wouldn't recommend going way out of your way for it.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse