Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
True Art vs. Fake Art -- a test
#1
Go ahead. Try to beat me -- you amateurs!
I got 42%

http://reverent.org/true_art_or_fake_art.html
I'm nobody's pony.
Reply
#2
I got 75%. I thought you were an artist, CF?
So much for the flickr badge idea. Dammit
Reply
#3
I got 50%. But if using my own personal definition, I think only the Kandinsky qualified as "true" art.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
Reply
#4
83% here.

I missed 1 and 3.

I knew 3 was fake, but I thought it was awesome, almost bob-esque.
[Image: magpie13.gif]
Reply
#5
75%, but I still know what I like.
Reply
#6
But I copied ED's answers.
Shadow boxing the apocalypse
Reply
#7
67%. I thought Dr. Bob did #3. I demand a recount!
In the Tudor Period, Fencing Masters were classified in the Vagrancy Laws along with Actors, Gypsys, Vagabonds, Sturdy Rogues, and the owners of performing bears.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)